Comments on: Duplicate Content Nonesense

By: Sweet 16 NFL Power Rankings Week 4

Sweet 16 NFL Power Rankings Week 4 — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:57:37 +0000

Interesting but right now we have an article up titled ‘Sweet 16 NFL Power Rankings Week 4′. It is listed under Google’s Hot List for NFL Power Rankings Week 4. Immediately to the left? The same exact article on an Asian site. Same title, text, etc (and not even a link back to us).

Google needs to put a stop to that nonsense.

Bob’s Blitz

By: introspective

introspective — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:10:03 +0000

I used to publish my articles, but now I wander should I stop doing this, because the risk of duplicate content penalty. Should I stop publishing my articles on article directories?

By: florida webdesign

florida webdesign — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:42:33 +0000

This makes perfect sense as your own site would have originating content on it first. Now how would that apply for someone who may be re-posting your articles via an rss stream on their website? The content would be second hand, but would it still contribute to the overall worthiness of your site for having abundant content?

By: admin

admin — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:26:28 +0000

It’s a chance worth taking

By: Advertising

Advertising — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:59:52 +0000

Thanks for the reply, back to prove I read it!

You say above “Once an original article is published on your site and has been indexed by Google, ie it shows up in a Google search, then Google understands that to be the original source of the article.” What would happen if someone else were to erm… ‘borrow it’ and get spidered before you do?

Just my brain working overtime…

By: admin

admin — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:45:25 +0000

Perhaps it depends on your definition of penalty. In my opinion your site won’t benefit from re-publishing someone else’s work, but I don’t see that as a penalty, ie I don’t believe other original material (pages) on your site would be punished.

By: Advertising

Advertising — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:15:25 +0000

“Once an original article is published on your site and has been indexed by Google, ie it shows up in a Google search, then Google understands that to be the original source of the article.”

Are you saying that Google will tag EVERY single piece of information with a date and a source as to where it saw it first ?

Google actually says on the page you point out..

“There are some penalties that are related to the idea of having the same content as another site—for example, if you’re scraping content from other sites and republishing it, or if you republish content without adding any additional value.”

So therefore there ARE some penalties to be avoided. I can reproduce someone else’s content if I were to add value to it eg: a discussion about it. So it is feasible to outrank someone for their own content if that page is then well optimised (I would guess).

I would say that there is nothing wrong with adjusting your content if you are submitting to seperate sources/sites – but I wouldn’t have sleepless nights over it.

By: SEO Services

SEO Services — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:49:36 +0000

Nice, I’m glad you’re clearing that up for people. I too have seen Google state this before too. But I agree it’s still better to have unique article content as much as possible out there.

By: admin

admin — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:21 +0000

Yes, but once several sites have syndicated your content it’s not unique any more anyway….

By: Small business owner

Small business owner — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:28:32 +0000

Totally agree with the above, Google state within their webmaster forum that sites will not be penalised, however in order to gain maximum juice from syndicated articles would it not be better to submit different versions of an article, thus ensuring the links in are from pages of unique content?