Comments on: Is SEO just Quality Control by Another Name? http://seo.redevolution.com/is-seo-just-quality-control-by-another-name/ DIY SEO (and stuff) for Small Businesses Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jeffrey http://seo.redevolution.com/is-seo-just-quality-control-by-another-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2960 Jeffrey Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:02:49 +0000 http://seo.redevolution.com/?p=25#comment-2960 Well, hopefully in the future, the initial development of all Web sites will follow a standardized approach (WASP, but that seems too idealistic) - I haven't been calling it quality control myself - just basic, good development practices. Perhaps taking usability and accessibility into a count will help bolster a site's rankings as well. But probably not - the metric for these seem out of the scope of search engines. Well, hopefully in the future, the initial development of all Web sites will follow a standardized approach (WASP, but that seems too idealistic) – I haven’t been calling it quality control myself – just basic, good development practices. Perhaps taking usability and accessibility into a count will help bolster a site’s rankings as well. But probably not – the metric for these seem out of the scope of search engines.

]]> By: Richard Boyd http://seo.redevolution.com/is-seo-just-quality-control-by-another-name/comment-page-1/#comment-324 Richard Boyd Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:03:18 +0000 http://seo.redevolution.com/?p=25#comment-324 All good points Dave (I think it's Dave) Good stuff and when you liken it to a document it follows the logical flow as a well written document should. All good points Dave (I think it’s Dave)

Good stuff and when you liken it to a document it follows the logical flow as a well written document should.

]]>